Colonial Legacies Post
Independence
Government
As international institutions created post WWII, these countries (even large ones) left
out of leadership posts
Varied in effectiveness depending on:
local (good)
or European administrators (not so good) under colonialism
a presence
of a tax system
a good
sense of national identity
Lots of corruption fills vacuum of efficient administration
In Europe, civil services emerged to curb power of business or for
moral reasons;
In colonies, government services were the source power, rent
seeking
Education
Education did come with colonialism, but often to a minority,
often only until high school
Those with most education often could not fit in abroad or at home
This is because Europeans taught that their system was best, and
that local systems or ideas were not just different, but inferior
Figuring out how to devise a locally relevant education still plaques many former
colonies
Legacy
(cont.)
Economics
Remained dependent on core for finished products, processed
materials like steel, markets for raw materials
Many dependent on a few exports, susceptible to price drops
Almost no gov. owned manufacturing,
which was most profitable at the time
Health
Life
expectancy (especially among infants) increased exponentially with basic
hygiene and medicine, leading to huge population growth
(Lack of) Stability
Borders often designed to not produce unity or with no logic
Nationalism: One nation, under a grove.
People & Terms
Benedict Anderson One of
the most important thinkers on nationalism, argued instead of being around from
forever, came about as modernization made imagined communities possible
He especially singles out universal education and newspapers
Eric Hobsbawm
Another thinker on nationalism, wrote history book tracing the emergence of
national traditions in recent centuries
Called it the Invention of tradition, by harkening back to a
quasi-historic, geographically selective heroic epoch to define the nation
Ideology -- The integrated
assertions, theories and aims that constitute a sociopolitical program.
Sometimes it is: big over-simplified ideas and half truths that
the powerful put forth to blind the masses to the truth of their social
situation
Practice Idea that things are
done more by action, than conscious thought (i.e. hierarchy doesnt come from
thinking about it, it comes naturally as tasks are performed)
Nationalism
Nationalism Desire to bring cultural and territorial imperatives
together (identifiable group + land)
Idea that people have something cultural that unites them despite
distance, gender, race and class
Inherently geographical idea that as time passes (for the
nation), the space (of nation) is still there.
Nationalism is something that is created
Requires new institutions to be created to make diverse groups
feel as one
Institutions dont necessarily have to have a positive effect to
unite people
These institutions make up an imaginative discourse
Is a highly gendered concept
Nation is often referred to as a woman motherland; lady liberty,
Britannia
In the founding discourse of a nation it is often men who are
represented as fighting to protect women/land
Womens roles in revolutions often overlooked, they were only expected
to participate as child-bearers (they actually did much more)
Nationalism (cont.)
Johann Herder, 19th century
German philosopher and major influence on early modern geography, was probably
first philosopher of nationalism
thought each
nation should have government to allow democratic free expression of their
needs and identity
Thus the idea of the nation state
Emerged in many colonies by the 1920s
Struggle against colonial power
After independence, renamed many streets, buildings, even cities
(Sri Lanka, Cairo, India)
Also can be Diasporic, i.e. people who still feel a part of one
nation, even though they now live somewhere else
Originally applied to Jews w/ homeland in Israel, people living
throughout Europe, Middle East, Americas
Now applied to Africans on all continents (Pan-Africanism),
South Asians
Nationalism (cont.)
Nationalism is not going away (and seems to be increasing),
despite global media, global economy
Allows a group to hang onto something in the face of external
economic and cultural changes
Think U.S. post 9/11
Sub-State Nations (separatist groups) often leading the way. Why?
Nation state only exists in theory
All states are
multi-national states (states with more than one national group).
Japan and South Korea most homogenous
Linguistic difference (Basque, Quebec)
Often in making the larger nation state, peripheral languages are
discouraged, become politicized.
Groups losing language are also usually peripheral to economy and
national culture
Religious difference (Timor Leste, Chechens, Tibetans) which lead to differential
inclusion.
Wait, so what are these institution things?
These are absolutely huge, because nations do not stay unified without some
sort of push
Institutions Are
organizations which perform a function for the public, be it economic,
political, social or cultural
Many argue that they are crucial for the reproduction of a
cohesive society, because it is through them we acquire common ground
Religions for a long time were the most prominent institutions
Provide links across generations
Provides moral codes
Kept Written History and Records
Important Institutions if you
want to build a nation state
Education
Reaches people at a young age
While it is about making a strong workforce, it is also about
building a citizenry with stories in common
Building a common story is hard in very diverse places, especially
where the diverse people fight
Languages which get taught tend survive, as do traditions
Not just schools, but also museums, archives, universities, books,
documentaries
Huge issue in Africa, where many places dont have local textbooks
Other Government Institutions
Welfare
Providing social services and payouts causes people to be invested
in the state
Most extreme in Persian Gulf where most citizens are completely
dependent on state for their livelihood
Insuring Political Representation
If government spreads position of power among various
constituencies, or if they allow proportional representation, more people have
voice
But ideal is that people lose regional interests for national ones
United States and United Kingdom have national parties, where
people come to see past ethnic and regional interests
Cult of Personality
Where leader is elevated to near-god status, is father to
everyone in the nation
Even more institutions
The Arts
Not just to make well rounded people, but build cultural capital, make money, and
construct a national story
Post-independence, many colonies tried to stop focusing on the
Euro canon, and make their own
Four types of support a government can provide
Declaring certain resources to be art, which makes them symbols
(can be paintings, buildings, even landscapes)
Build spaces for display of public art, idea that prestige is
transferred to anything inside
Support creation of new work by paying (certain) artists, holding
festivals where they can sell
Support in indirect arenas, such as education, and copyright
protection for individual works
Private support of businesses is also crucial
Institutionalized
Media
After Independence, many countries chose government owned media
In part because media not profitable in poor places
Also to control messages, emphasize less contentious/more uniting
issues
More recently, media has been privatized
It is now pop culture which unites people
Soap Operas, Talk Shows, Reality TV
Landscape
Heritage tourism landscapes and monuments are sites of pilgrimage
to the national story
National Parks for both tourism and unity reasons
Whose heritage and which heroes to be monumentized
is a big question?
Confederate statues are a good example
The Problem with Institutions
Institutions also have the potential to divide as well unite,
depending how they treat different groups
If groups get excluded from or ignored by or disparaged in
institutions, it will become a source of protest
In secular Turkey and Iran, Islam became a form of protest
In Algeria and Morocco, Berber language became a form of protest
National Institution: Sports
Modern organized sports
originated in Britain
Not to say there werent sports throughout the world, throughout
history
Britain established the same rules throughout the country, had
institutions which set the rules
Horse Racing, Fox Hunting, formalized in 17th century
& 18th century (later golf)
Associated with rural gentry, masculinity, and discipline
More Brits
Soccer, Rugby, Tennis, and Track and Field solidify in the 19th
century
Soccer and Rugby are the first to become working class team sports
All sorts of legislation aimed at frustrated factory workers
helped sports
The half-day off on Saturday gave workers free time
Playing Fields and the urban parks legislation turned parks and
green space into center of leisure time for workers
Owners, schoolmasters saw
team sports as way to teach teamwork and discipline
As professional teams emerge, allows people to spend time as
spectators
Later Developments
By late 19th century, the United States and Canada
began exporting its sports basketball, volleyball, baseball, ice hockey (gym
sports)
Games are spreading to former colonies, though Europe and United
States dominate in competitions
1960s begin to see the turnaround, when former colonies begin
surpassing colonizers (Brazil in Soccer, India/West Indies in Cricket, table
tennis in China)