Foundations
of the American Urban System: Part One
This
Lecture
5
epochs that established the foundation of the American Urban System:
Frontier:
Founding to 1790
Mercantilism:
1790-1840
Early
Industrial Expansion and Realignment: 1840-1875
Organization
of Industry: 1875-1920
Early
Fordism: 1920-1945
Understand
how technology, transport,
economic change, frontierism, and other
social changes shaped the American Urban system
Frontier
Urbanization
Unlike
Meso-America, few large pre-Columbian settlements in
North America
Both
the Hohokam and Anasazi in
the Southwest built extensive irrigation canals and roads, traded with Toltecs (but did not develop major cities like groups in Meso-America)
The
Mississippian people built Cahokia, Illinois (near St. Louis), which existed
from about 700-1300, including large mounds
At
peak, was probably in 30,000-40,000 range
Compared
to the valley of Mexico and lower elevations of the Andes, North America was
very lightly populated, so both settled/agrarian and hunter/gatherer tribes
tended to have a decent amount of space and little impetus to city build.
Frontier Urbanism (cont.)
Spanish
the first European power to set a permanent settlement
St.
Augustine, FL the first; Santa Fe, NM the 3rd (in between was the
Dutch New Amsterdam (now NYC))
The
Spanish also found a series of pueblos (centers of commerce and admin),
missions (centers of religious conversion), and presidios (military forts)
throughout the southwest
San
Antonio, San Diego, LA, Santa Barbara, San Fran, etc...
The
French also establish trading outposts along Mississippi and Great Lakes
Quebec,
Detroit, St. Louis, New Orleans, La Crosse, etc
English
first in Jamestown, VA then Williamsburg, VA to grow tobacco also where the
British brought first African slaves to US
Charlestown,
SC eventually becomes the most significant port in the Southern US
In
the North, many cities like Newport, RI, Boston, MA, Baltimore, MD and
Philadelphia, PA are founded by religious dissenters (or Catholics)
Frontier Urbanism (cont.)
Eventually,
the British take and name NYC, and along with Charleston, Newport, Boston,
Baltimore and Philadelphia, become the major gateway cities/entrepots for the American colonies
These
gateway cities
Assemble
staple crops for export
Distribute
imported manufactured goods
Administer
the new territories
Like
colonial gateway cities the world over, they trade mostly with Europe, not each
other
Of these, New York
had the best natural harbor and rivers (and eventually canals) that penetrated
deep into its hinterland (the land that is associated with a
larger city). But on the eve of
independence, only had 25,000 people
Frontier Urbanism (cont.)
Over
time, new inland gateway cities emerge that collect produce and bundle it
before sending it on to ports
Hartford,
CT; Albany, NY; Lancaster, PA; and Richmond, VA were the first wave
Later
on cities like Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago, St.
Louis, Kansas City hold these roles.
Many
early East Coast cities were along what was called the Fall Line, where the
metamorphosed rock of the Piedmont dropped off to the sedimentary rock of the
Coastal Plain.
Why?
This
was often the head of navigation the farthest inland on a river a boat
could go (because of waterfalls)
These
sites with falling water could power mills, and thus were sites for early
industrialization
These
include: Lowell, MA; Harford, CT; Albany, NY; Fall River, MA; Montreal, QC;
Trenton, NJ; Philly; Wilmington, DE; Baltimore, MD: Washington, DC; Richmond,
VA; Fayetteville, NC; Columbia, SC; Augusta, GA
Mercantile
Epoch
The
US Constitution did several things that allowed cities to grow effectively
Giving
the federal government exclusive right to create tariffs and mint money, thus
forbidding states to create tariffs internally (thus creating a uniform, single
market)
The
new country needed to trade internally to upend dependence on Europe
Most
new American investment by Americans, meaning profits no longer leaked back to
Euro cities
A
new system of government was needed, with district, regional and state courts and
administrators (including a brand new city to be the capital Washington DC)
The
plans for westward expansion assured new cities would emerge as local service
centers
Mercantile (cont.)
Roads
in the era were incredibly slow, rivers dominated commerce
Thus
explosive growth of St. Louis, New Orleans
The
Erie Canal connected the port of NYC with the Great Lakes (Buffalo, C-town,
Detroit, Chicago, Milwaukee) via the Hudson River, while another route links
Philly and Baltimore to the Ohio River (Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Louisville)
Some
cities, like Cincy in Pork (fed by Ohio and Kentucky
corn), begin to specialize based on their comparative advantage (what
they can do most efficiently, based on local conditions)
Manufacturing
began to emerge in the Northern colonies (which were less dependent on
plantation export agriculture)
Along
with the big cities, Lowell, MA; Albany, NY; Newark, NJ; Providence, RI; and
Wilmington, DE make the cradle of American Industrialization
Mercantile (cont.)
Though
people of English descent dominate, about 40% of some other ancestry
At
independence, out of 2.5 million, 1/5 are slaves
Behind
slaves, next larges groups are the Scotch-Irish and
Germans
Bigger
numbers soon to come
This
era also sees a boom in agricultural production
Combo
of getting better farm land through opening the interior, better farm tools and
better techniques
This
means same number of people can produce more food; meaning more people
available to settle cities
By
1840, New York at nearly 400,000 is four times larger than its nearest rivals
for size: Baltimore and New Orleans (followed by Boston and Philly)
Cincinnati
has become the most important city in the interior
Living
in the Mercantile City
These
cities, sometimes called walking cities, were defined by their compactness
Most extended no more
than a 2 mile radius from their center (how far a person can walk in a half
hour)
Thus every type of
land use (housing, warehousing, retail, workshops, banks) mixed in with housing
Goods were moved
around by hand cart or horse cart
Densities
were very high (75 per sq mile before things like elevators and skyscrapers),
only relief came to cities like NYC, Philly when ferry service was established
to open a second bank of development
Waterfront
tended to be the hub of activity, with its merchant offices, wharves and
warehouses
Slightly inland you
get hotels, banks, churches, public buildings, homes of prominent families
Squeezing into open
space were housing for artisans, shop keepers and laborers, this extended to
the edge of town
Most people lived
next or in the place where they worked from factory owners on down to servants
Mills, breweries,
slaughterhouses and tanneries tended to be on the very edge of town
Unlike older European
(and certainly Middle Eastern cities), US cities in this era develop very few
ethnic/occupation quarters (although Irish quarters were most common)
Vances
Mercantile Model
Through
abstraction and diagram drawing, tries to generalize the process of colony
making described above.
Only
mention it because it was very prominent for a long time, but like most models
is only a generalization that misses a lot of detail
5
phases
Exploration
Finding what is there
Harvest
Natural Resource Taking what nature provides (pelts, timber, fish)
Emergence
of Farm-Based Production Start to get staple crops for export; gateway cities
along the coast to process exports and receive imports
Establishment
of Interior Depot Centers More demand for products and more colonists push
colonization inward; new cities found and old gateway cities grow
Economic
Maturity/Central Place Infilling A big enough domestic market allows industry
to emerge in the old gateway cities and interior depots; smaller central places
begin to emerge to fill in the gaps between the older cities.
Early
Industrial Expansion and Realignment
Improved
machines, increasing industrialization, and rural to urban migration fuel urban
growth
Additionally,
1840s begins the huge waves of European immigrants
First
wave was the beginning of the great Irish emigration, with people fleeing the
potato famine and near criminal British Laissez-faire policy
The
reception the Irish got in the US, especially as Catholics, was not warm; lots
of ghettoization in East Coast cities
1850
wave saw people leaving Germany, France and the low countries
due to changes brought mechanization of agriculture and industrial
overproduction
1870s
add the Scandinavians (many to the upper Midwest)
1880s
until the beginning of the quota system around 1920 see Italians, Central and
Eastern European Jews, and East-European Slavs (many of whom come to cities and
mines)
Again,
because these immigrants were different (Catholic, Jewish or Orthodox) from the
Northern Europeans, they too faced discrimination that led to the Emergency
Quota Act (1921) Immigration Act (1924)
New
Towns and City Types During Early Industry Era
Power
Sites: Early industries needed falling water (see Fall Line cities mentioned
last time)
Mining
Towns: Once coal and ores (iron, copper, etc) were needed for
industrialization, new mining towns sprung up (West Virginia coal and Upper
Peninsula Michigan cooper)
Transportation
Centers: New cities emerge where canals and railroads get routed (Roanoke,
Virginia and eventually Atlanta)
Heavy
Manufacturing Towns: These need huge volumes of both raw materials and power
(Pittsburgh with both coal and iron)
Early
Industry
Railroads
really begin to take off during this time
First
railroads are about feeding produce from agricultural areas into established
ports (Chicago, Memphis, Nashville, Cincinnati, St. Louis), thus worked with
rivers
With
the completion of Transcontinental Railroad in 1869 and the huge increase in
miles of track, get a national rail network that can bypass St. Louis and New
Orleans with grain
As
plow technology improves, upper midwest
farmable for the first time and Minneapolis and Kansas City begin to grow
This
also allows the first emergence of the Great Lakes Manufacturing Belt (aka
Steel Belt, now Rust Belt)
Two
big east west wholesale alignments:
NYC/Buffalo/Cleveland/Detroit/Chicago
Philly/Pittsburgh/Cincinnati/Louisville
Rail
density and industrialization does not proceed as extensively in the South
Being
able to sell things across the continent means American business can take
advantage of economies of scale (that the more you produce of something,
cheaper it is to make each unit)
Theories
of Urban Growth in Urban Industrial Era
Most
urban growth and industrial growth occurs in already large towns and cities
Theories
why?
Initial Advantage: Cities that already have stuff get more
In
the U.S. case, early cities already had transport and wholesale businesses for
infrastructure, their owners who had capital, financial services, innovators,
large pools of labor, and large and affluent populations
This
made them likely sites for mass producers
Theories of Urban Growth (cont.)
External Advantage (or Agglomeration Advantage): Any advantage that
comes from collective than exclusive use of any of the elements necessary for
profitable activity
Examples
include skilled labor, business services (marketing, etc.) and good physical
infrastructure (ports, roads, etc)
If these advantages
are confined to a particular industry, it is called Localization Economies
Includes
specialized pool of labor, focused technical schools/university programs,
shared marketing or research institution, and associated subcontractors
This
was cars in Southeast Michigan; Rubber in Akron, OH; publishing in NYC
»
Obviously,
these do not necessarily hold forever
Theories of Urban Growth (cont.)
Rank size rule: Population of City = Population of Largest
City in Country / Rank of City in Country
This
(mostly) holds for US in this era where New York (1.3 million in 1875) is 3 to
4 times larger than nearest 5 cities (Baltimore, Chicago, Philadelphia,
Pittsburgh, St. Louis) and 10 times larger than next 10
When
you plot this on a chart, makes a nice curve where the distribution remains
constant, but a citys relative ranking floats over time
HOWEVER
Like many similar formulas that are simple, it has lots of exceptions,
for example, many countries have a primate city many orders of magnitude larger
than its nearest competitor (Buenos Aires, Dublin, London, Mexico City)
Innovation and Urban Growth: The larger the city is, the more steady and
predictable its growth rate (ie variability in growth
rate decreases with urban size)
Theory
behind this is innovation theory, that places with most innovations (or
successfully adopted outside innovations) both keeps current residents and
attracts migrants
In general larger
places do this (and places near where innovations occur (neighborhood effect)),
but sometimes a random small place hits a big idea