PHI3300
Epistemology
Title |
Epistemology
|
Prefix
and Number |
PHI 3300 |
Section |
U01 |
Semester/Year |
Fall 2024 |
Location |
Comp, Arts, Sci
& Educat (CASE) 145 |
Day/Time |
Mo/We 2:00PM -
3:15PM |
Instructor |
Kenton Harris |
Instructor
Office |
DM 343 B (MMC) |
Instructor
Telephone Number |
(305) 348-3516 |
Instructor
E-mail |
|
Instructor
Web Site |
|
Text(s) |
Assigned
Articles |
Tests |
One In-class Exam (multiple
choice and essay) |
Papers |
One Thesis
Paper (8-10-page papers) |
Final
Exam |
Yes (multiple
choice and essay) |
Lesson Plan and Links to Notes and
Readings
Important Dates:
Grades
Assignment |
Date
Due |
Percentage
of Final Grade |
Exam 1 |
10/28/24 |
30% |
Writing Assignment for this Course |
35% |
|
11/11/24 |
||
11/18/24 |
||
11/25/24 |
||
11/25/24 |
||
Final Exam |
As scheduled by the University Calendar |
35% |
End
of the Drop/Add Period |
Last
Day to Drop Without incurring financial liability |
|
Last
Day to Apply for Spring Graduation |
||
Last
Date to Drop and Receive a “DR” |
Course Description:
This course introduces core concepts
and questions in Epistemology (the theory of knowledge) such as: What is
knowledge? How does knowledge differ from opinion? What does having knowledge
require? What is a belief? When are we justified in believing something? Is
knowledge possible? What type of information about the world do our perceptual
experiences convey to us? Which beliefs about the world do perceptual
experiences provide direct justification for? What is the nature of truth? Students
will learn about theories developed in response to these and other questions.
Readings: All
readings will be available on-line, on my website or on Canvas.
Requirements: 1 exam,
one paper and a final exam.
Basic Policies
Below
are listed various procedural policies.
By remaining a registered student in this course you indicate you
acceptance of the policies listed in this syllabus.
Attendance and make-up policies:
1. Class
participation and the in-class assignment are an integral part of a
satisfactory grade. Poor attendance will
result in a lower grade.
2. With
respect to make-up exams, documented emergencies will be dealt with on an
individual basis.
Drops:
Students
unable to continue in the course should notify the instructor. It is
their responsibility to fill out official withdrawal forms with the registrar's
office. If they do not officially withdraw, they will receive an F for the
course.
Special Learning Needs:
Students with documented special learning needs are
asked to have Disability Resource Center (http://drc.fiu.edu/)
inform the instructor so that accommodations can be made when necessary for
testing, note taking or, paper writing, etc..
Class Conduct:
1. All
students must come to class, on time and prepared with his or her materials.
Requirements and
Grading:
Requirements:
Paper:
The Writing Requirements for this course will consist of six
components
Paper Assignments:
There
will be one assigned thesis paper. It
will take the form of a critical summary and examination of a text or article
from a professional journal or other suitable professional venue (professional
conference, conference proceeding, virtual professional journal, etc.). I will provide you with a list of suitable
peer-reviewed professional journal articles.
Students should select one of the articles listed, although exceptions
will be considered.
Peer-reviewed
journals contain articles by professional philosophers written for other
professional philosophers. I anticipate that students will find them
challenging. Students should not be
discouraged by this. I will work with students
to help them along if and when that becomes necessary.
This paper will take the form of a critical summary of and
response to a selected article from a contemporary professional philosophical
journal. In
this class we are utilizing peer review writing techniques. On the day that the Paper 1 First Draft is
due students will submit an electronic version to my Blackboard site for this
class. The submitted paper copy should contain no identifying information. I will then use the feature in Blackboard to redistribute
the papers to peers within the class.
Each student will act as a peer
reviewer for a fellow student. Acting as
a peer reviewer, each student will read a fellow student’s paper, provide
feedback and fill out a rubric evaluation on Blackboard. With the information provided by the peer
reviewer, students will then write a second, final draft of the original paper.
Important
Note about the peer reviews:
Because of the way Canvas is
configured, you must submit these peer reviews in two different ways.
First you must submit the comments to
your peers using the comments box provided by Canvas next to your
peer’s paper.
However, you
must also copy and paste the same comments into a document and upload that
document to the assignment in your assignments list entitled “Peer Review.”
If you only submit your peer comments
via the assignments box, your classmates will not have access to them. If
you only submit your peer review comments into the comments box on your
classmates’ papers, I will not receive a copy nor will I know when you have
completed this assignment.
Therefore,
it is important that you do both. You
must submit the peer review comments into the comments box on your peers’
papers, but you must also submit those same comments in a separate document to
me using the assignments box.
I understand that this is a little
confusing, but it's the best I can do given the way Canvas has configured this
assignment.
On the due date for Paper 1 Final Draft
students will submit it to Canvas. For
this draft, students
will
prepare that paper for professional publication or presentation. This means that students must
At
that same time students will also submit an additional document:
As
a separate submission, each student will provide a document which identifies
the venue for professional presentation that the student has selected. This document will also explain why
the student has chosen that venue, why it is a suitable venue for the student’s
paper and what specific formatting was required for submission (e.g. submission
guidelines, deadlines, blind review format, required citation style, etc.).
The purpose of this assignment, aside from
being the typical philosophy paper writing requirement of an upper division
philosophy course, is for students to gain some perspective on the professional
activities of working philosophers, those who are currently contributing in
this field, and what institutions are supporting this research etc.. Students are very familiar with what
philosophy professors do inside the classroom, but they are less familiar with
what they do outside of the classroom.
It is these latter activities that are responsible for the advance of
the discipline and most often form the basis for hiring, tenure and promotion
decisions.
The grade for this assignment will be
based on the quality of the original draft, the accuracy and completeness of
the work the student did as a peer reviewer for his or her fellow classmate,
and the quality of the final draft, specifically the degree to which it
represents a further refinement and development of the first draft. It will also be based on the accompanying
“venue” document and the degree to which the student successfully followed the
submission guidelines of the chosen presentation venue.
This grade will count as 35% of the
student’s final grade.
In-class Examination:
There
will be one in-class exam as designated by the lesson plan. This exam will be
count as 25% of the final average.
Final Examination:
A
final examination will be given during the final exam week as specified by the
University calendar. The final exam will
be objective and essay and be drawn from class lectures and text material. The
final exam will be not be cumulative, but rather cover material presented after
the first exam. The final exam will
count for 35% of the final grade.
Grading:
Grades
will be based on the paper (35%
total), in-class exam (30% total),
and the final exam (35% total).
Grading
Scale:
A
= (100-94) A- = (93-92)
B+ = (91-88) B = (87-84) B- = (83-81)
C+ = (80-77) C = (76-74) C- = (73-70)
D+ = (69-66) D = (65-63) D- = (62-60)
F = (59-0)
ATTENTION STUDENTS:
NOTE both the grading scale and the exam and paper dates now. No exceptions will be made so you must decide
NOW whether these terms are acceptable to you or not or whether they interfere
will travel plans or personal commitments.
It is your decision to remain in this course under the specified
conditions and I encourage each of you to thoughtfully consider this before the
drop/add deadline.