Publications

2017

Schreiber Compo, N., Vallano, J., Rivard, J., Hagsand, A; Pena, M., & Altman, C. (in press). Methods of studying eyewitness memory. In H. Otani & B. L. Schwartz (Eds.), Research Methods in Human Memory. London, UK, Routledge.

Rivard, J. & Schreiber Compo, N. (in press). Self-reported current practices in child forensic interviewing: Training, tools, and pre-interview preparation. Behavioral Sciences and the Law.

Schreiber Compo, N., Carol, R.N., Evans, J.R., Pimentel, P., Nichols-Lopez, K., Holness, H., Rose, S., & Furton K. (2017). Witness memory and alcohol: The effects of state-dependent recall. Law and Human Behavior. 41, 202-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000224

 

2016

Campbell, I.L., Rivard, J., & Schreiber Compo, N. (2016). Mock jurors’ perceptions of blind vs. non-blind interviewing: The role of recantation. The Journal of Psychological Inquiry, 21 (2),15-22.

Schreiber Compo, N., Pena, M., Rivard, J., McQuiston, D., Vallano, J., & Stoiloff, S. (2016, June). Wrongful Convictions, Cognitive Bias and Forensic Science. The Police Chief.

Rivard, J., Pena, M. & Schreiber Compo, N. (2016). ‘Blind’ interviewing: Is ignorance bliss? Memory, 24 (9), 1256-1266.

2015

Hirn Mueller, D., Schreiber Compo, N., Molina, J., Bryon, A., & Pimentel, P. (2015). Productive and counter-productive interviewing techniques: Do law enforcement investigators know the difference? Psychology, Public Policy, and the Law, 21, 295–308.

Carol, R.N. & Schreiber Compo, N. (2015). Other People: A Child’s Age Predicts a Source’s Effect on Memory. Legal and Criminological Psychology. doi: 10.1111/lcrp.12078

Vallano, J.P., Evans, J.R., Kieckhaefer, J.M., & Schreiber Compo, N. (2015). Rapport-building during witness and suspect interviews: A survey or law enforcement. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29,
369–380.

Hirn Mueller, D. & Schreiber Compo, N. (2015). Missed opportunities for justice. In S. Schwartz (Ed.), Where Psychology and Law Intersect: Issues in Legal Psychology, (pp.281-250). San Diego, CA: Cognella Academic Publishing.

Vallano, J.P. & Schreiber Compo, N. (2015). Rapport-building with cooperative witnesses and criminal suspects: A theoretical and empirical review. Psychology, Public Policy, and the Law, 21 (1), 85-99.

2014

Kieckhaefer, J., Schreiber Compo, N. & Vallano, J.P. (2014). Examining the positive effects of rapport building: When and why does rapport building benefit adult  eyewitness memory? Memory, 20 (8), 1010-1023.

Fisher, R.P., Schreiber Compo, N., Rivard, J., & Hirn, D. (2014). Interviewing witnesses. In T. Perfect & S. Lindsay (Eds.) Handbook of Applied Memory (pp. 559-578). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Press.

2013

Carlucci, M., Schreiber Compo, N., & Zimmermann, L (2013). Lie detection during high stakes truths and lies. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 18 (2), 314-323.

2012

Schreiber Compo, N., Evans, J.R., Carol, R., Villalba, D., Ham, L., Garcia, T. & Rose, S. (2012). Intoxicated witnesses: Better than their reputation? Law and Human Behavior, 36 (2), 77-86.

Hyman Gregory, A., Schreiber Compo, N., Vertefeuille, L., & Zambruski, G. (2012). A comparison of U.S. police interviewers’ notes with their subsequent reports. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 8, 203-214.

2011

Vallano, J.P. & Schreiber Compo, N. (2011). A comfortable witness is a good witness: Rapport-building and susceptibility to misinformation in a simulated mock-crime interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(6), 960-970.

Schreiber Compo, N., Evans, J.R., Carol, R., Kemp, D.C., Villalba, D., Ham, L. & Rose, S. (2011). Alcohol intoxication and memory for events: A snapshot of alcohol myopia in a real-world drinking scenario. Memory, 19 (2), 202-210.

2010

Schreiber Compo, N., Hyman Gregory, A. R. & Fisher, R.P. (2010). Interviewing Behaviors in Police Investigators: A field study of a current U.S. sample. Psychology,  Crime and Law, 18(3-4), 359-375.

Schreiber Compo, N. & Parker, J.F. (2010). Gaining insight into long-term effects of inviting speculation: Does recantation help? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 969- 990.

Wright, D.B., Carlucci, M., Evans, J.R. & Schreiber Compo, N. (2010). Turning a blind eye to non-blind line-ups. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 849-867.

Evans, J.R. & Schreiber Compo, N. (2010). Mock jurors’ perceptions of identifications made by intoxicated witnesses. Psychology, Crime and Law, 16(3),191-210.

2009

Hyman Gregory, A., Carol, R. N., & Schreiber Compo, N. (2009). Talking with children  about past events: Children’s memory and suggestibility. In E. H. Sandberg & B. L.  Spritz   (Eds.), A clinician’s guide to normal cognitive development in childhood (pp.155-171). New York, NY: Routledge.

Evans, J.R., Schreiber Compo, N. & Russano, M. (2009). Intoxicated Witnesses and Suspects: Procedures and Prevalence according to Law Enforcement. Psychology, Public Policy and the Law, 15(3), 194-221.

2008

Malpass, R.S., Tredoux, C.G. , Schreiber Compo, N., McQuiston-Surrett, D., MacLin, O.H., Zimmermann, L.A., & Topp. L.D. (2008). Study space analysis for policy development. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(6), 789-801.

2007

Norberg, S.F. & Schreiber Compo, N. (2007). Report on an empirical study of district variations, and the roles of judges, trustees and debtors’ attorneys in Chapter 13 bankruptcy cases, 81, The American Bankruptcy Law Journal, 431.

Fisher, R.P. & Schreiber, N. (2007). Interviewing protocols to improve eyewitness  memory. In Toglia, M., Lindsay, R., Ross, D. & Reed, J. (Eds.) The handbook of  eyewitness psychology: Volume One. Memory for events (pp.53-80). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.

2006

Schreiber, N., Bellah, L.D., Martinez, Y., McLaurin, K., Strok, R., Garven, S.,  & Wood, J.M. (2006). Suggestive interviewing  in the McMartin preschool and Kelly Michaels day care abuse cases: A quantitative analysis. Social Influence, 1 (1), 16-47.

2005

Fisher, R. P. & Schreiber, N. (2005). Forensic psychiatry and forensic psychology: Forensic interviewing. In J. Payne-James, R. Byard, T. Corey, & C. Henderson (Eds.) Encyclopedia of Forensic and Legal Medicine (pp.371-378). Oxford: Elsevier Science.

2004

Schreiber, N. & Parker, J.F. (2004). Inviting child witnesses to speculate: Effects of age and interaction on children’s recall. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 89 (1), 31-52.

2001

Schreiber, N., Wentura, D. & Bilsky, W. (2001). What else could he have done? – Creating false answers in child witnesses by ’inviting speculation‘. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (3), 525-532.

2000

Schreiber, N. (2000). “Interviewing techniques in sexual abuse cases – a comparison of a day- care abuse case with normal abuse cases“. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 59 (3),196-206.

Schreiber, N. (2000). Zeugenbefragung von Kindern – Wie wirkt die Technik “Einladen zur  Spekulation?“. Grevenbroich: Linos-Verlag. (book)

Sporer, S.L., Bursch, S.E., Schreiber, N., Weiss, P.E., Höfer, E., Sievers, K. & Köhnken, G.(2000). Detecting deception with the Aberdeen Report Judgement Scales (ARJS): Inter-rater reliability. In A. Czerederecka, T. Jaskiewicz & J. Wojcikiewicz (Eds.), Forensic psychology and law. Traditional questions and new ideas (pp.197-204). Krakow: Institute of Forensic Research Publishers.