Writing Proofs, Part III - quantifiers
A quantifier is a phrase that puts a variable into context. The most common ones are "There is a ..." and " For all ..."
In these examples, the variable will be x, which stands for a real number. In general, the "variable" could really be a function, a matrix, or whatever.
Example 1: For all x, (x + 1) + 1 = x + 2.
Example 2: There is an x such that x + 1 =5.
Example 3: If the quantifier is missing, the sentence is
(slightly) wrong, but probably "for all" was intended.
On the previous page I wrote "If x>2 then x>3"
but really meant "For all x, if x>2 then x>3". In
practice, the "for all" phrase is pretty similar to
"if-then". For example, you could say "For all
x>2, x>3".
Let's start with some True-False practice involving quantifiers. As before, think about why you are answering True or False, and how you'd explain your answer to a friend.
Comments: Ex1 is true, and similar to an example on the previous page. Ex 2 is false, as you can see from a single counterexample, such as x = 0. Ex 3 is true when x = -7. Ex 4 is true. The explanation should be based on general principles (such as the distributive property). Ex 5 is true, and a simple example like x = 0 is a proof (or you could use Ex 4). Ex 6 is false. You can use algebra to show the two parts contradict each other.
Summary of these proof strategies:
OK, let's practice with these ideas a bit.
Suppose you want to prove that "For all x, if x >0, then 3x > 0." is true. Then you'd (choose one):
If you feel lost and want to do some background reading, contact me. Or if you just want to tell me what you think of this page. If you are ready to go on, you can try Writing Proofs, Part IV but it's not written yet, and probably won't be, unless you ask for it. I'd like to know whether this kind of drill really helps you.
Written by S.Hudson, 5/1/02